Callais and Its ConsequencesBy Marshal Trigg, Counsel, USGI On April 29, the Supreme Court handed down its 6 to 3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, holding that the state’s 250-mile, snake-shaped 6th Congressional District—linking the populations of Shreveport, Alexandria, Lafayette, and Baton Rouge to create a second majority-minority district—amounted to an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The ripple effects have been fast and wide-ranging, as are the longer-term implications for future redistricting fights. The day after the ruling, Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry suspended the May 16 U.S. House primary, and was subsequently hit with several lawsuits which are currently pending. On May 4, the Court granted the Callais plaintiffs’ request to expedite issuance of the judgment, waiving the usual 32-day waiting period and enabling the state legislature to enact a remedial map. The same day, Florida enacted its own redistricting legislation. Tennessee followed suit on May 7. On May 11, the Court lifted the federal injunction blocking Alabama from using its legislature-drawn map, and relisted